Comparison · Savings rate

New York vs Sydney: 33% vs 13%

New York wins on savings rate by 20 percentage-points. Rent burden: 25% in New York vs 30% in Sydney. Median incomes: $170,000 (USD) vs A$112,500 (AUD).

United States

New York

Winner
Savings rate
33%
Median income
$170,000 /yr
Median rent
$3,500 /mo
Rent burden
25%
Total core costs
$6,000 /mo
Years to FIRE
32 yrs
Australia

Sydney

Savings rate
13%
Median income
A$112,500 /yr
Median rent
A$2,800 /mo
Rent burden
30%
Total core costs
A$5,200 /mo
Years to FIRE
107 yrs

Verdict

  • Savings rate: New York (33%) beats Sydney (13%) by 20 pp.
  • Rent burden: New York (25%) is more affordable than Sydney (30%).
  • FIRE timeline: New York reaches financial independence in ~32 years, vs ~107 years in Sydney.
  • 5-year wealth gap: The 20-pp annual savings-rate gap compounds to ~100 percentage-points of gross income over five years — directly attributable to local cost structure.

New York vs Sydney — FAQ

Which city has the higher savings rate, New York or Sydney?+

New York has the higher savings rate at 33% of gross income, compared to 13% in Sydney. That is a 20 percentage-point gap. Over a 5-year horizon, the gap compounds to roughly 100 percentage-points of gross income — meaningful for anyone optimising long-term wealth.

What is the income gap between New York and Sydney?+

Median New York household income (mid-band) is around $170,000/year (USD). In Sydney it is around A$112,500/year (AUD). Different currencies make a direct gap meaningless without an exchange rate, so compare savings rate (%) and rent burden (%) instead.

Is rent worse in New York or Sydney?+

Rent burden is higher in Sydney: rent eats 30% of gross median income there, vs 25% in New York. Median monthly rent is $3,500 in New York and A$2,800 in Sydney. New York is the better city for renters at the median income level.

Which city is better for early retirement (FIRE), New York or Sydney?+

Using a simple 25x-expenses FIRE benchmark, a mid-income earner in New York could reach financial independence in roughly 32 years at the current local savings rate, vs 107 years in Sydney. New York is the better FIRE city for mid-income earners based on local savings rate and cost structure.

What about cost-of-living adjusted — does New York still win?+

Yes. Savings rate already factors in the local cost of living, because it is calculated as (income − expenses) ÷ income using BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2023. New York's 33% rate is the cost-adjusted figure — it already reflects what residents actually save after paying rent and other expenses. The 20 percentage-point lead over Sydney is real, not a currency illusion.

Methodology

Savings rates from BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2023 for New York (United States) and ABS Household Expenditure Survey 2022/23 for Sydney (Australia). Median income is the midpoint of the default income band for each city. Rent burden is annualised rent divided by gross median income. Years to FIRE assumes a 25× annual expenses target, saved at the local benchmark rate, with no investment growth — a deliberately conservative proxy for ordering cities, not a forecast.

Comparisons across different currencies should focus on percentages (savings rate, rent burden), not absolute amounts.